TEXIT Q&A: Have Republicans Reached the Independence Inflection Point
James asks if mainstream Texas Republicans have reached the tipping point on independence. The data shows they already have.
Page 3 of 17. Newest stories are on page one.
James asks if mainstream Texas Republicans have reached the tipping point on independence. The data shows they already have.
The myth that international scrutiny would block Texas independence crumbles against legal precedent and economic reality.
Bert asks how an independent Texas stops corrupt actors from hijacking government. Daniel Miller explains the structural safeguards independence creates.
The claim that Texas needs UN recognition to become sovereign ignores international law and real-world precedents from Kosovo to Taiwan.
Jerry asks about Texas border control after independence. Answer: Full sovereign authority over immigration and borders, permanently fixing federal failures.
Franklin asks about physician-assisted suicide legislation in Texas. TNM President Daniel Miller provides a direct assessment of current political dynamics.
The Constitution never required federal permission for secession. Texas has the constitutional right to independence under the Tenth Amendment.
Daniel Miller answers Caleb's question about holding wayward Texas judges accountable through electoral and constitutional mechanisms.
TNM President Daniel Miller reveals organization's media strategy evolution from volunteer-driven to professional communications team as national exposure grows.
Justice Scalia's 2006 letter claiming the Civil War settled secession ignores basic legal principles and constitutional text.
The Constitution provides procedures for admitting states but says nothing about removing them. Critics claim this makes Texas independence impossible.
John asks if primary challengers can realistically overcome Abbott and Patrick's massive fundraising and name recognition advantages. The answer requires understanding Texas's broken system.