The day after the 89th Legislature gaveled in and elected Dustin Burrows as Speaker of the Texas House, the questions poured in faster than one Late Night Coffee Talk could hold, and most circled the same event. Daniel Miller argued that nearly everyone was reading it wrong. The popular framing was that the more conservative David Cook lost to a moderate, but the scorecards put Burrows and Cook within two or three points of each other. This was never a contest of ideology. It was a contest over culture, over whether the House would keep operating as a club where the Speaker plays the game instead of calling balls and strikes, picking winners and losers and spiking the bills of anyone who will not tow the line. That arrangement traces back through Bonnen and Strauss, and the establishment broke its own Republican caucus rules to keep it intact.
It also exposed who the House answers to. Constituents drove in, spent their own money, and were locked out of a ticketed gallery even as ticketed seats sat empty. Burrows called it the people’s house while the people stood outside. Leadership thanked DPS for security and spoke of unusual circumstances, language that quietly recasts ordinary citizens as a threat. Democrat Richard Raymond’s nominating speech for Cook ripped a corner off the lid, naming the back-room machinery and the fear of retribution that keeps members in line.
For the movement, the real headline was not Burrows. Eleven Texas First Pledge signers took the oath of office that day, which is eleven more than the skeptics ever said the movement would get. The same people who swore the referendum bill would never be filed watched it get filed twice, with authors and joint authors both times. The question now is structural. The Texas Independence Referendum Act will be filed again, substantively the same bill with new dates, and its fate runs through the State Affairs committee, where it stalled before when the chair refused to grant a hearing. Watch who gets that chairmanship. On the Senate side the path depends on movement in the House first, since senators do not want to be seen torpedoing a historic vote that then dies across the rotunda. Meanwhile Rule 44 waits in the wings: the Republican Party of Texas has given its censure process real teeth, including the authority to spend against censured incumbents and to refuse their filing to run, and the 30-plus Republicans who backed Burrows just walked into its path.
Questions answered in this episode
- If it is the people’s house, why were constituents barred from the gallery while ticketed seats sat empty?
- What exactly is Rule 44, and how far do its new enforcement powers reach?
- The new Speaker killed the referendum bill in calendars last time. How do we get around that?
- What does the Texas Senate landscape look like, and do we stand a better chance there than in House State Affairs?
- What is the best strategy before the next primary for dealing with the House members who voted for Burrows?
- What is it actually going to take to get a referendum so Texans can vote on independence?
- Will Texas ever be an independent country again?
- What is happening with the northern Mexico independence movements and Nuevo Leon?
- Can the Speaker vote be nullified since it ran contrary to the will of the voters?
- Will the TNM financially help replace the Republicans who broke with the grassroots?
- Where did that statue of the figure holding the Texas flag come from?
Comments have moved. The real debate about Texas independence now happens with thousands of Texians in the app.
Get the TEXIAN app
