Wednesday, October 28, 2026

SponsorSubscribe
Texas votes Tuesday, November 3. Early voting turnout now; live results for every statewide race from 7 PM CT on election night.See the Results Page

Late Night Coffee Talk

Divide and Demoralize: Austin’s Strategy to Break the Texas Movement

Daniel Miller

Sponsor
Universal Coin & Bullion: Thanks, Dr. Mike Fuljenz, for no sales tax on precious metals in Texas

Daniel Miller opens this Late Night Coffee Talk fresh off a community workday and lands hard on the Texas legislature. The political establishment in Austin, he argues, is running a two-part play he calls the 2D strategy: divide and demoralize. Borrowing from Gene Sharp’s concept of atomization, the tactic autocratic regimes use to fragment any coherent opposition, Miller says Austin is splitting the conservative and independence base with wedge issues while running out the clock on the priorities voters actually asked for.

He walks through the legislation he sees as proof. The transactional gold and silver bill that he believes would have been a boon for Texas economic sovereignty but came shackled to federal-court permission. HB1904, a bill regulating balloon releases that escalates a dropped helium balloon into fines and even jail time. And the foreign land-ownership bill whose amended language would still let foreign adversaries hold Texas land on 99-year leases, a number he notes lines up suspiciously with the old Hong Kong lease. He calls it intentionally outrageous, designed less to govern than to wear people down. Meanwhile property tax, the priority Texans keep naming, gets traded for THC limits and a move to kill the lottery.

His message to anyone tempted to quit: recognize the demoralization for what it is, an outside force, and refuse it. He is not telling anyone how to vote. He is saying that a base that comes out of this session unified rather than fractured is the one thing the establishment cannot survive at the next primary.

Questions answered in this episode

  1. Which Texas legislators are blocking a free, open, and honest election?
  2. Has Texas ever been reimbursed by the federal government for its border-security costs, and is anyone seriously trying to collect?
  3. How does the Texas Sovereignty Act’s claim that the Union has overstepped its agreement with the states connect to the case that Texas should leave?
  4. What can Alberta’s independence movement learn from Texas, and what can the TNM learn from Alberta?
  5. Will the TNM ever become its own political party, the way Scotland’s SNP or Quebec’s party did?
Share

See more of the Partisan in Google’s Top Stories.Add as a Preferred Source on Google