Daniel Miller ran this Late Night Coffee Talk on a cold night from the podcast studio, where the map on the wall behind him shows Texas with its original borders. That map set up the first question and one of the recurring misconceptions he likes to clear away. Texas has no claim to the land beyond its current shape. The federal government bought that territory after a near military conflict over what is now Santa Fe, paying Texas in bonds, and those very bonds later became part of the controversy in Texas v. White. The other myth he buried alongside it: the United States never paid off the Republic’s war debt. The union refused to take Texas in if it had to assume that debt, so Texas joined carrying its own obligations.
He spent his longest answer on strategy, explaining the two frameworks the TNM builds its outreach on. Diffusion of innovation theory says you reach innovators and early adopters differently than the late adopters and laggards, because each group has its own pain points and inertia. Tipping point theory, which he traced to research at Rensselaer Polytechnic, says that once a population reaches a threshold of people with unshakable belief, majority adoption follows in every scenario. His read on the public mood is that Texans are no longer scared or unaware. The questions have shifted from whether independence is possible to what happens after it, which tells him the premise has already been accepted.
The sharpest distinction of the night was definitional. Miller pushed back hard on the word secession, arguing it lets opponents drag Texas back to the 1860s. What Texas would do is withdraw its membership from a voluntary political and economic union, the same way the UK left the European Union, which no one calls secession. That distinction also answers the slippery slope. Counties cannot follow Texas out because they are administrative subdivisions, creatures of the state with no sovereign existence of their own. He also toured the Texas Bullion Depository in Leander, the state-owned vault built so Texas funds no longer store their gold at a bank in Manhattan, and teased an upcoming podcast connecting federal media manipulation to the smearing of TEXIT supporters as Russian bots.
Questions answered in this episode
- If Texas became independent, would it keep its present boundaries or revert to the original, larger map?
- What is the plan to get mass adoption of the idea, and what do Texans misunderstand that holds them back?
- Has Texas ever gotten its gold reserves back inside Texas?
- What would change with the Texas House and Senate after independence?
- Why does the TNM not distribute its information through the US Postal Service, and how do you book a speaker to help organize your county?
- Would the movement welcome Spanish-speaking volunteers, and how important is the Hispanic vote to Texas independence?
- If Texas has the right to leave the union, do its counties have the same right, and what about HOAs?
- Is another Texicon coming, and can the videos be released sooner after the event?
- What is the best book on Texas history before statehood?
- Does Daniel ever take a break from politics, and how does he unwind?
Comments have moved. The real debate about Texas independence now happens with thousands of Texians in the app.
Get the TEXIAN app
