Daniel Miller settles in with a fresh cup for another midweek Q&A, and the through-line of the night is a movement that refuses to stand down just because Washington changed hands. The opposition predicted a Trump win would kill TEXIT. Daniel counts exactly one supporter lost to that thinking, against a steady pile of new registrations. His read is blunt. The wrecking ball that Trump and Elon Musk are taking to the federal bureaucracy is temporary, the popular-vote margin was closer than anyone should be comfortable with, and federal judges and agencies are already throwing up roadblocks. Texans, he argues, are treating this as a reprieve, a window to organize counties and get as close to independence as possible before the next swing. He points to a University of Houston Hobby School survey: only 19 percent of Texans trust the federal government to do the right thing, and a clear majority say the country is on the wrong track. Those numbers, he notes, are not softening.
The heaviest segment is structural. Asked which federal departments an independent Texas would need to build, Daniel walks through months of work mapping every federal function to an existing Texas analog. The Texas Military Department and its three branches stand in for Defense. The comptroller handles Treasury. The General Land Office and TCEQ cover Interior and environment. The Railroad Commission already runs energy and oil and gas. Education, Transportation, Health and Human Services, Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, and Housing all have state-level counterparts. His point is that the gap between statehood and a self-governing nation is small, and that after a successful referendum Texans get to scale these agencies up or down on their own terms.
He also explains why TEXIT deliberately avoids locking in post-independence policy, using Scotland as the cautionary tale. When the SNP let the opposition bait it into publishing a governing manifesto, the referendum stopped being about independence and became a vote on the SNP. On critics who call independence illegal or economically impossible, Daniel is unsparing: show him the law, read Article 1 Section 10 and the Tenth Amendment, and stop burning hours fighting anonymous accounts when persuadable Texans are waiting to be reached.
Questions answered in this episode
- Does the TNM have a transition plan for after independence, covering how the government would be funded, whether unjust laws would be repealed, and whether property taxes would be abolished?
- With DOGE exposing federal waste and fraud, will more Texans come to see independence as the ultimate solution?
- Younger guardsmen seem short on Texan patriotism. How do we make the National Guard Texan again?
- After independence, which departments and agencies would be worth establishing, and what already exists in the Texas Constitution or dates back to 1836?
- Which Texas legislators are holding up a free vote of the people on independence?
- Critics say Texas independence is neither legally nor economically possible. What is the best way to counter that argument?
- What is Daniel’s personal opinion on HR25, the federal Fair Tax bill?
- How have Texans kept such a distinct identity and independent spirit after so long in the union?
- If Abbott left for Washington, who would be the best person to become governor?
- What is going on with California’s tax office in Houston and its attempt to tax former residents inside Texas?
Comments have moved. The real debate about Texas independence now happens with thousands of Texians in the app.
Get the TEXIAN app
