Daniel Miller opened this Late Night Coffee Talk with a confession dressed as a data report. The strange email Texans received that day, the one carefully scrubbed of the words “TEXIT,” “Texas Nationalist Movement,” and “TNM,” was a test. After months of control groups, warmed-up domains, and neutral-language send experiments, the TNM tech team reached a verdict by preponderance of the evidence. It is not the domains and it is not a technical fault. When TNM language appears in a message, it lands in the spam folder more than 80 percent of the time. Miller’s own Google-hosted business address dumped the test email straight to junk.
That finding reframes everything. Texas has an anti-censorship statute, the same law TNM used to sue Meta, and it carries a specific provision for email providers: no viewpoint discrimination, a transparent process, fines reaching $10 per unlawfully impeded message and $25,000 per day of non-compliance. Miller is not rushing to court. The legislature left a loophole, and ironically the inability to reach supporters makes it hard to raise the money a fight would require. The likelier path is handing the file to Attorney General Ken Paxton. The immediate answer is the TNM mobile app, the one channel no algorithm sits between.
From there the talk turned to the wreckage inside the Texas House. Miller played the floor clip of Rep. Brian Harrison pressing Speaker Dustin Burrows on a quorum declared with only 63 members present, on Democrat committee chairs, and on a thousand-page budget dropped with roughly 20 hours to read it, a budget that grows spending near 40 percent and funds the very DEI programs Texas claims to have banned. He tied the two crises together. An organization that cannot reach its own supporters stays atomized, and atomized is exactly how a broken system survives scrutiny. He also pointed to the transactional gold bill, now carrying 83 co-authors, as a concrete step toward a Texas currency, and explained the new YouTube channel membership funding expanded TNM content.
Questions answered in this episode
- Has the CalExit campaign really gathered 100,000 more signatures than it needs to put a referendum on the 2027 ballot?
- If war breaks out in Europe, how would it affect the movement for Texas independence?
- Is Rep. Jasmine Crockett actually from Texas, and should Houston claim her?
- Did the legislature pass a law tying ERCOT into the national grid, and does Texas need to shore up its own resources before an independence vote?
- How do we hold state representatives accountable so they stop trading chairmanships and power the way the current Speaker has?
- How many provisions of the Texas Constitution has the House already violated this session?
- What should we make of Rep. Brian Harrison’s petition to remove Dustin Burrows as Speaker?
- Greenland is reportedly open to becoming a US territory. Why would any people fight for independence only to surrender it again?
- How would Texas reclaiming its sovereignty affect the tribal reservations inside its borders?
- Is secession still a plank in the Republican Party of Texas platform?
Comments have moved. The real debate about Texas independence now happens with thousands of Texians in the app.
Get the TEXIAN app
